This Facebook group puts architecture to shame, and here are 29 buildings its members want to burn down

People make mistakes, and some of those mistakes happen at work. Usually the incident is corrected and the whole thing can be forgotten in a few minutes. But if it was an architect who made a mistake, the “hiccup” can be much more noticeable.

There’s a Facebook group called “C’est ça, je suis Architecture Shaming – Burn It to the Ground Edition” and it’s dedicated to calling out every building that its members believe shouldn’t have seen the light of day.

Of course, if there are no objective negatives (like structural damage), it largely comes down to taste, sparking heated discussions, but it does make scrolling through the content much more interesting.

More info: Facebook

According to Associate Professor Melonie Bayl-Smith of the UNSW Built Environment, architecture today suffers from an originality syndrome.

“When architects try to do something completely original, they don’t necessarily produce a better building,” she said, adding that originality shouldn’t necessarily be an architect’s highest value.

“I see that architecture today, in some cases, has become a very form-based exercise, often to the detriment of the quality of space or other crucial aspects of architecture. it responds to something to do with site or place or people – apparently we just want it to look different,” Bayl-Smith said.

The professor argued that creating a well-thought-out product is more important than doing something about its novelty.

“I think we, as a profession, need to do a better job of recognizing what works well, and developing and enriching those approaches, whether it’s spatial design, material design, design processes. building assembly, sustainable practices – all the different things that go into building a great sustainable building,” she said. “There are enough mediocre buildings out there; we don’t need to keep ‘inventing’ others just to try to be ‘original’.”

There are a few basic architectural concepts that explain why some buildings just stare. First of all, we have to look by looking at their mass.

“The primary mass is the largest shape in the building block. The secondary masses are the additional shapes that form the facade of a building.” So if there are too many, the house has no concept and looks weird. Also, buildings need balance. Beautiful houses are usually symmetrical or asymmetrical. Designing them any other way could result in conflicting roof lines and other architectural elements.

Even if today we have countless tools to make a design work, some mistakes still end up too often. According to Build It, it’s not a good idea to save money on building elements that will be difficult to upgrade later, such as bricks or tiles. Also, using too many different materials could be one of the reasons a house turns out to be fake. This can make it look too “busy” and distract from other features.

Architects have the power to make our lives easier and new buildings and public spaces should welcome and protect society, not confuse us.

After all, a United Nations (UN) report stated that 55% of the world’s population today lives in urban areas. A figure that is expected to rise to 68% by 2050. Our environments are changing at incredible speed, which is why designers, planners and architects face challenges to ensure they serve the people who live there. .

Comments are closed.